Welcome to the workspace on Uralic Glossing!

To join this workspace, create an account. Click on EDIT to add your comments. Do not forget to SAVE! If you have any questions, ask unifi.it reverse anne.tamm for the time being.

This is the page devoted to the glossing problems of the Uralic languages. Here are the pages specialized on the Uralic languages (under construction)

• Enets, Nenets, Nganasan, Selkup, Hungarian, Khanty, Mansi, Komi, Komi-Permyak, Udmurt, Mari, Erzya, Moksha, Sami, Estonian, South Estonian, Finnish, Ingrian, Karelian, Livonian, Veps, Votic.
• the Leipzig glossing rules
• Lists of additions to the Leipzig list:
• case
• tense
• aspect
• evidentiality
• possessive markers
• non-finite forms
• ...

Here are the proposals concerning specific glossing problems by the following authors, as they appeared on the Uralist (contact Johanna Laakso to join): 

• Grünthal proposal for discussion.
• object conjugation. Erzya, Mansi, Samoyedic examples, discussion.
• connegative forms of verbs are seldom marked overtly. North Saami, Mari examples.
• Fejes
• proposes the formation of a small group for discussing the glossing issues of the Uralic languages
• discusses Grünthal' s glossing, incl. grammatical categories which cannot be linked to any surface morph
• Tamm where we need uniformity and where diversity in glossing. Estonian examples. Proposals for web pages.
• Matsumura not everybody applies the LGR. Examles from Mari, Saami
• Fejes 2, 3 commenting on Matsumura's examples and glossing
• Siegl Warning: LGR is NOT meant as a guideline how to gloss a given language, and glossing conventions are a matter of analysis. Connegative. Forest Enets. Suggestions for further action
• a three-day conference with special working groups consisting of participants from around the world, including native linguists if available.

• after the conference, a wiki for discussing proposals should be set up.

• finally, gathered proposals and comments from this wiki could be reviewed in a follow-up conference and

• on the basis of this, some possible Uralic Glossing Conventions (UGC) could be proposed.

• Miestamo
• the same researcher may gloss the same form differently depending on context. Finnish example
• the distinction of the glossing syntax (fixed) and lexicon (partly varying).
• connegative
• Viks, Tamm:

• a summary of more general problems of morphological glossing

• generation of glosses starting with the morphological basis (in the example, on the basis of a morphological analyzer)

• the example of Estonian.

• Markus and Rozhanskiy, example of Votic 4-line examples including glossing